Sellers didn't disclose water/drainage issues, can we hold them responsible?

Peter, typically you would need to prove that the seller deliberately concealed the incident. I would highly suggest you reach out to a real estate attorney to determine your options as we can't provide legal advice here. They should be able to get you pointed in the right direction. Best of luck with everything. Keith Jean-Pierre Managing Principal The Dapper Agents Operations In: NY, NJ, FL & CA

Possibly, yes. In Florida, the Johnson v. Davis standard requires sellers to disclose any material facts they know about the property that a buyer could not readily observe. Water intrusion and drainage problems are almost always material, which means nondisclosure can be actionable. In Hernando County, drainage and water issues are common because of our sandy soil, flat grade, and the seasonal rains on the Nature Coast. The FAR/BAR contract disclosures and the Seller Property Disclosure form both ask sellers to affirm what they know. If the sellers signed that and knew, that is where your attorney focuses. What I would do, in order: document everything with photos and dates, get written estimates from a Spring Hill grading or drainage contractor, pull the seller disclosure form from your closing file, and talk to a Florida real estate attorney before you contact the sellers directly. In Hernando, attorneys often start with a demand letter before anything escalates, and a lot of cases resolve there. This is not agent territory, it is attorney territory. A free 30-minute consult is normal, and most will tell you quickly whether it is worth pursuing. -- Kevin Neely & Kaitlynd Robbins | K2 Sells, Keller Williams Elite Partners

You can hold a seller liable if you can prove they had "actual knowledge" of the defect and intentionally concealed it. Most standard 2026 sales contracts include a disclosure form where water intrusion is a mandatory item; if you find evidence of fresh paint over water stains or recently patched foundation cracks that weren't mentioned, you have a strong case for a "Failure to Disclose" lawsuit. Your first step is to hire a forensic inspector to document the timeline of the damage, then have a real estate attorney send a demand letter to the seller's agent to seek a settlement before heading to court.

You likely have recourse, and the fact that they explicitly denied it on the disclosure form is significant. That's not a gray area. Seller disclosure fraud or misrepresentation is a legitimate legal claim in most states, and denying a known defect in writing is exactly the kind of evidence that makes these cases worth pursuing. Start documenting everything right now. Photograph and video the flooding, get a drainage contractor to assess it and put in writing that this appears to be a long-standing issue, and pull any permits or records from the municipality that might show prior drainage work on the property. Neighbors can also be useful here since flooding problems in Victorians tend to be known in the neighborhood. The stronger your evidence that the sellers knew, the better your position. Then get a real estate attorney involved before you do anything else. They can send a demand letter, which sometimes resolves it without litigation, or advise on whether a lawsuit makes sense given the repair costs. Three months out is still well within the window to act. Don't wait much longer though.

You may have a valid claim if you can prove the sellers knew about the drainage issue and failed to disclose it—especially since they explicitly denied it on the disclosure form. These cases often hinge on evidence (prior repairs, invoices, neighbor statements, or signs of concealment) showing the issue wasn’t new. The fact that the inspection missed it during dry conditions doesn’t automatically protect the sellers if they knowingly withheld information. Your best next step is to consult a real estate attorney quickly, as there are time limits, and they can help assess whether you have a case for damages or repair costs.

Hi Peter I would reach out to your real estate professional and/or an attorney for advice on what your recourse could potentially be.

You may have a case, this doesn’t automatically become your problem just because you closed. In most states, sellers are required to disclose known material defects that aren’t obvious and could affect the value or livability of the home. A recurring drainage issue that floods the basement typically falls into that category, especially if they specifically denied it on the disclosure form. The key word here is known. You would need to show they were aware of the issue and failed to disclose it. Start by gathering evidence, look for past repair invoices, permits, insurance claims, or even conversations with neighbors who may have seen it happen before. Things like fresh paint, recently replaced drywall, or grading work right before the sale can also help support your case if it looks like they tried to cover it up. Even though your inspection didn’t catch it, that doesn’t necessarily hurt you. Inspectors can’t see what isn’t happening at the time, and intermittent issues like drainage problems often only show up during heavy rain. Your next step is to talk to a real estate attorney. If you can prove non disclosure, you may be able to recover damages for the cost to fix the issue, or potentially pursue a claim for misrepresentation. Timing matters, so don’t sit on it.

Yes—potentially, but it depends on proof. In most states, sellers are required to disclose known material defects like water intrusion. If the buyer can show the seller knew about the drainage/flooding issue and failed to disclose it, they may have a claim for misrepresentation or fraud. Key factors: • What was stated on the disclosure form • Any evidence the seller knew (past repairs, prior flooding, neighbors, etc.) • Inspection findings before closing It’s very fact-specific—this is something a real estate attorney should review.

Yes you can request compensation if the seller lived in the home they surely knew about the flooding. The agents involved can only be held liable if they knew about the issue. Did the home inspector not see any water lines on the basement walls?